Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Rancid Crabtree

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 13
121
Archery / Longbow Build along (Page 1) (Part 1-8)
« on: April 03, 2008, 05:33:19 AM »
I am going to show the steps in making this bow for my son. I am not an expert by any stretch. This will be a build along sort of thread but I must warn you that this will be slow going. I have many projects in the works with much stricter time lines than finishing this bow for my son so there will be periods of inactivity. Thats just real life.

This bow will be a reflex/deflex Long bow. It is a hybrid combination of a longbow and a recurve. Longbows are typically straight when unstrung and recurves are still curved even when unstrung. This bow will look sort of like a recurve while unstrung and like a longbows when strung.

Here is a pic I stole off the web to give you an idea of what I am going for.



The woods I am using for Josh's bow are the same ones I use to make knife handles. For the most part, they are South American hardwoods. The riser will be made from Bubinga, Bloodwood and good old American hard rock maple from a tree my Dad cut many years ago. Sort of a legacy piece of wood, cut by my Dad, Made into a bow by me and finally used by my son. I will also use some of the Maple in the limbs.



this is the order in which I will stack the layers.



Most S.A. hardwoods have oils in them that make gluing difficult, so I use acetone to clean and degrease. Blood wood and purple hear are some of the oiliest. You can see the orange oil in the basin of the sink. It took a long time to clean that sink. I should have sprayed it with pam first.  :oops:



Once cleaned, I used a hacksaw blade as a scrapper to rough up all the gluing surfaces. Epoxy does not like smooth surfaces.



The glue I am using can be purchased at a number of bow building web sites. This is a two part epoxy that gets stronger if cured under a heated condition. This is important because if you leave the bow in a hot car on a sunny day, The glue had better have been cured at a high temp to keep the bow from de-laminating.



It mixes like any other epoxy.



Make sure to cover your work surfaces with wax paper or plastic wrap. It is hard to clean up any spills. Then simply butter both sides of the surfaces to make sure you have no dry spots that will later separate.



I use spring clamps because C-clams will get loose during the heating process when the glue oozes out. (trust me, there is a lot of oozing) :(  Spring clamps keep a constant pressure at all times.



I then take the riser and put it in a preheated oven. Bake for 8 hours at 180F until a nice golden brown and serve with a scoop of vanilla ice cream .    ::)

When it comes time to glue up the bow itself, I will build an oven box that is 6 feet long as the bow will not fit in the oven. I will heat this box with 100 watt light bulbs.

Fast forward 8 hours and a few more hours for a slow cool down period and the riser is all glued up. The rubber tips of the clamps need to be pried from the glue.



Next, I ran the block through my table saw to square it up and remove the excess glue.





Then I drew the riser pattern on the wood and cut it out with a band saw and sanded the fade outs on a drum sander.





This glue is a flexible epoxy. Normal hardware store epoxy would crack and break if bent like this.



Make sure to use only enough glue for the job at hand. A little goes a long way.



I now need to make the form that I will use to glue the bow on and I need to make the heat box. Like I said, this is going to be a slow moving project. I will post more progress as I get a chance to work on it.

122
Wisconsin General Events and Activities / 2008 Sports fest
« on: March 21, 2008, 12:36:05 PM »
Learn about this WI event that will benefit all hunters whether they be bowhunters, upland bird, Waterfowl, Firearms deer, bear or Turkey. This event is a fundraiser meant to protect ALL hunters against those that mean to end our traditions.

If you are interested in being ticket vendor or an individual interested in selling tickets, click the link to learn how you can help.

This event Takes place on August 15 and 16 at the Sunnyview Expo Center in Oshkosh, WI

http://www.wisportsfest.com/


123
General Discussion / New Hunting/fishing/sports show in SE WI
« on: February 28, 2008, 08:08:10 AM »
Held in Oconomowoc, WI. Lots to see. Speakers/seminars like
March 7, 8, 9th 2008
Olympia Resort
Oconomowoc, Wisconsin
Joe Bucher - Hunting Trophy Bucks the Bucher Way
Tammy Koenig - Blood trailing tactics
Doug Hoskins - Turkey calling tactics

http://wisconsinoutdoor.com/smf/index.php?topic=1219.0

124
Archery / A trip to the Wisconsin Bowhunters Museum
« on: February 09, 2008, 10:01:16 PM »
I drove up to Clintonville, WI for the open house held at the WBH museum. It's just getting under way but I can tell they they will soon be out of space.



Immediately upon entering I saw a few Broadhed collectors and we began talking. Then I took a tour of the whole place. There is a lot of neat stuff to see, including the donated collection from the estate of the late ABCC Member Keith Huehnerfuss. There is about 3000 heads in that collection. It is very impressive.





There is also a collection of all the broadheads that were made in Wisconsin with info on the heads maker and location in the state.



There was a lot of really great vintage bowhunting and archery gear from waaay back









Lots of vintage stuff behind the glass from the likes of Bear, Case, Pearson, LaHa, Wiffen, etc. and now even some new replica vintage arrows with a flint knapped and a steel trader point head donated by some guy called Rancid Crabtree.



The broadhead collectors traded heads and planned the WI version of the ABCC member get together. It will be held in two weeks in Hixton



If you have not had a chance to check it out and you are in WI. Make the drive to Clintonville and look around.

125
Whitetail Deer / The CWD SAG final report
« on: February 08, 2008, 02:17:18 PM »
is now on the DNR web site

Click HERE for WDNR CWD SAG report
http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/wildlife/whealth/issues/CWD/advisory.htm

126
Archery / Broadhead Collection
« on: February 05, 2008, 06:51:53 AM »
My Son Josh and I just loaded the latest case with heads. Josh has the beginnings of a really great broadhead collection. We built two cases. One holds the modern, screw in type heads and the other holds the old school glue on heads. Each case will hold 125 heads and both are nearly filled. It has been a great project for the two of us.








127
Wisconsin DNR Outdoor Reports and News / It's at Your doorstep now!
« on: January 30, 2008, 05:10:51 PM »
Guess who is new to WI and beginning the fight to take away your right to hunt. I got this from the HRC only moments ago. The Alliance for animals (great sounding name huh?) now has roots in Madison and has a lobbyist. Lori Nitzel will be spending time in Madison bending the ears of the laws makers to take away your rights.

What are this new groups action items??? Animal advocacy and protection. Raising awareness about animal cruelty and education on the prevention of cruelty.

What are this groups Lobbying interests??? All legislation affecting animals: WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, HUNTING; puppy mills; cruelty legislation; animals in domestic violence; environmental legislation affecting animals; etc.

They have just formed and have yet to pour any money into Madison But it is here and coming after you. This is where the HRC will have your back and the backs of all hunters, whether you are pro this or anti that. The HRC won't care, they and their member groups will put all the petty crap in the background and fight for you. Still having a hard time coming to grips with joining a hunting org? It's time to rise up my friends, or keep fighting about baiting while this group takes away your rights.

http://ethics.state.wi.us/scripts/2007Session/LEOEL.asp?PrinID=4159

128
Whitetail Deer / CWD SAG update
« on: January 24, 2008, 08:21:48 AM »
The CWD Stakeholder Advisory Group's web site has now been updated to include the votes taken 2 weeks ago.
You can also see a draft of the document we will be presenting to the DNR Secretary Matt Frank when we meet with him on the 31st.

look under the headings of "polling document" and "Recommendation Summary"


Please note that on the first page of the "Recommendation Summary", under the heading of Crossbows, it states:

Crossbows – Allow use of crossbows for everyone during the archery season
I have sent an email asking that the wording be changed to read "Crossbows – Allow use of crossbows for everyone during the archery season, only within the CWDMZ". I do not want folks to read this and think that this was a state wide recommendation. I have already been told that the change will be made.

Minority reports, such as the WBH stance in opposition to the expansion of crossbows are not yet part of this document. I will be delivering that either today or tomorrow.


This site also includes the agenda for this Saturday's meeting but I do not see a time allocated for public comments. As far as I know, it is still open to the public but you would not be allowed to speak.

http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/wildlife/whealth/issues/CWD/advisory.htm

There are also links to videos of about 12 hours of presentations that were given to us. Check them out.

129
Big Game Recipes / Maken Bacon
« on: January 15, 2008, 07:20:17 AM »
On Sunday, I finished the long process of making bacon. I will attempt to explain the 2 week process here. Bacon comes from the pork belly but can be made from any part of the pig. Using shoulders gives me a less fatty bacon with more lean meat to enjoy.
 
I bought a 60 pound box of pork trim for sausage making. From this, I set aside 15 pounds of the fatty trim for this bacon. This trim is 72% fat.
 

 

 

 
 
The seasoning, I used was a high Mountain brand. I have had good luck with this brand so I gave it a try.
 

 

 
 
I sprinkled the dry cure and seasonings over the meat and mixed it well
 

 
 
I then placed all the pieces in a container and refrigerated it for ten days. After ten days, I soaked the pieces in cold water for two hours to remove any surface cure.
 

 
 
I placed the pieces of pork on racks and into my pre-heated smoker at 150F.
 

 
For smoke, I use hickory sawdust. I cover the pan with a lid to starve it of air. This allows smoke but no flare ups.
 

 
 
With lid removed
 

 
I smoked the meat until the largest piece reached an internal temp of 165F and then let it cool in the smoker.
 
 

 
I sliced one piece while it was still warm and the fat was still transparent so it's hard to see the fat lines like you see on store bought bacon
 
After cooling overnight I will vacuum seal the pieces whole and slice when I want to fry some
 
 

130
Whitetail Deer / CWD board recommendations
« on: January 14, 2008, 04:51:04 PM »
First of all, I would like to thank the other members of our board for their work on the issues involving CWD. A lot of folks put in a huge amount of effort that lead us to the recommendations we drafted on Sat. We voted on a wide variety of issues and some will be happy with our recommendations while others will be dissatisfied. I'm sure there are those who will dismiss the entire effort based on any one single issue that did not get resolved in a manner that agrees with them. That would be unfortunate. None of the board members is under the illusion that we will please everybody. I would also like to state that we were not passing laws of writing bills. We were simply making recommendations. All of our recommendations will then go to the DNR Secretary and then the NRB. The following is the process that will be followed with our recommendations.

January 31, 2008 – Presentation of recommendations to the Secretary (tentative)

February 1, 2008 – Green Sheet to Land Division Administrator

February 5, 2008 – Green sheet to NRB

February 15, 2008 – Send information about hearings to Revisor of Statutes Bureau (earlier than normal practice in order to allow hearings earlier than would otherwise be possible)

February 27, 2008 – NRB meeting and request to go to hearing

March 26 - 29 – Public hearings on CWD rules resulting from the public participation process.

April (1st week), 2008 – Prepare green sheet for adoption the same month (requires Secretary approval to submit the green sheet late)

April 23, 2008 - Natural Resources Board meeting to request adoption of proposed rules.

April 25, 2008 – Submittal of proposed rules to legislature’s chief of clerks.

May 7, 2008 – Likely date of referral to standing committees.

June 6, 2008 – End of first 30-day of legislative review period.

July 7, 2008 – End of second 30-days of legislative review

July 15, 2008 – Needs to be submitted to Revisor’s Bureau or Legislative Reference Bureau

August 1, 2008 – Publication of Administrative Register

Early August, 2008 – Deer regulations finalized to go to printer

September 1, 2008 – Effective date of CWD rules resulting from the CWD Public Dialog

As you can see, there is still a lengthy process and hearings to deal with our recommendations. Our group meets again on the 26th of January for our final meeting to draft our green sheet and to discuss minority opinions.

Now, back to Saturday's proceedings. 15 of the original 18 member board was present on Sat. for the vote. Members of the press were present including, Tim Eisele and Dean Borts. Only 3 members of the public were present throughout various periods of the roughly 10 hour session. None of the members of the public made statements when given the chance.

We agreed as a whole that votes would be pass or fail based on a simple majority. With 15 members voting, that meant 8 votes were required to pass any one item. Nearly 50 items/categories were being voted on with some having sub categories and bullet points as well as new motions from board members. In all, I would estimate some 65 votes were taken. In the interest of time, I will not explain every issue and the voting results. Some of the votes were in dealing with the CWDMZ (Chronic Wasting Disease Management Zone) while others were statewide recommendations. When I get an electronic copy of the the voting on each issue I will send it along. Here are some of the issues that are of interest to Bowhunters. (side note: our recommendations were for a 5 year period, after which they will be evaluated )

Within the CWDMZ, DMU goals will be set at 2001 density levels with a 20% reduction over a five year period. This motion passed.

No longer protect white or albino deer within the CWDMZ. This motion passed.

All State and County lands within the CWDMZ would be open to public hunting with no closed areas and would follow the same rules as the rest of the zone. This motion passed

Season structure within the CWDMZ: This entire portion of motions was replaced with a proposed season structure drafted my a board member and adopted by the group. The single biggest issue was implementing a separate combined muzzle loader/crossbow season. The crossbow use would be for persons of all ages and all abilities.

allow magnifying scopes (above 1X) for muzzle loaders during the ML season in the CWDMZ. This motion passed.

Charge a fee statewide for a buck tag to allow hunters to bypass EAB by buying a higher priced buck only tag. This motion failed.

Provide unlimited buck tags in the CWDMZ. This motion failed.

Hunting at night or with lights (laser). This motion failed

Allow the use of crossbows for everyone (all ages and abilities) during the regular archery season within the CWDMZ. This motion passed with a vote of 9 yea, 5 nea and 1 abstain. (It should be noted that I voted against this motion)

Allow group bagging during the archery season (as is done during firearms season) within the CWDMZ. This motion failed by 1 vote. (I voted against this motion)

Youth deer hunting. The motion was to expand the youth deer hunt to include 16 and 17 year olds. The motion read:Expand the statewide youth deer hunt to ages 12-17 and either sex (meaning youth could harvest bucks) This motion passed.

Allow riles within the entire CWDMZ except in metro zones. This motion passed

Expand shooting from all vehicles of animal husbandry, including trucks with farm plates. This motion failed

Ban the sale and use of urine based scents statewide. This motion failed

Depopulate all deer (cervid) farms statewide and issue no new permits to allow deer farms (this would make deer farming an illegal activity) This motion failed

Ban deer baiting state wide. This motion failed 5 yea, 7 nea and 3 abstain ( I abstained from this vote as the WBH representative since the WBH has a neutral stance on baiting)

Increase penalties for baiting violations. This motion passed 9 yea, 5 nea and 1 abstain ( I was the one that abstained per WBH's neutral stance)

change the penalties for baiting violations from a civil forfeiture to a criminal act. This would make baiting violations a felony. The DNR warden present noted that this would mean that violators (if convicted) would no longer be allowed to possess a firearm nor vote. This motion failed. (I abstained)

change the penalties for baiting violations from a civil forfeiture to a criminal act. Make baiting violations a misdemeanor. This motion failed. (I abstained)

Ban deer feeding state wide. This motion passed 7 yea, 4 nea and 4 abstain. ( I abstained from this vote as the WBH representative since the WBH has a neutral stance on feeding)

Continue sharp shooting within the CWDMZ. This motion failed

The motions to remove deer through various non-hunting methods such as:

Snares. Failed

Trapping, netting. Failed

Introducing wolves to the CWDMZ. Failed

Shooting from helicopters. Failed

Using poisons. Failed

Hunting with dogs. Failed

Introducing deer diseases such as EHD (Blue Tongue) Failed

I would expect a full reporting of all motions and votes through some form of the media very soon.



131
Archery / Project Bison
« on: January 09, 2008, 09:19:16 PM »
I’ve been asked by a friend (the guy who shot the deer with the broadhead in the brain) To outfit him with a arrow and broadhead combination for a February Buffalo hunt out West. He is using his current whitetail bow but wants more than the 350 grain arrow/broadhead set up he uses for deer. I agree with that. Everything I have heard and read about Bison is that you should be shooting for the heavy carpet that covers the front shoulders. I would expect that this hair is thick and matted and since the hunt will take place in February, that it might also be ice covered. For this reason, I will be shooting for an arrow weight over 700 grains.



After looking around for arow shafts, I settled on Carbon Express Heritage with the wood grain look. These shafts weigh around 12 grains per inch. The shafts are on order. Next, I picked the Wensel Woodsman as the broadhead for this hunt because I wanted him to use a strong, cut on contact head. The 3:1 aspect ratio of the woodsman means greater penetration. I ordered from 3Rivers, a half dozen 125 grain Woodsmans and since he will be screwing these into a carbon shaft, I also got some 100 grain steel adapters that are needed to mount a glue on style head to a carbon arrow. For added weight, I also got 50 grain brass arrow inserts instead of the normal 15 grain aluminum inserts. I also got him some brass weight washers.



I am trying to create a front heavy arrow (FOC moved forward) after reading Dr. Ashby’s report on extreme FOC arrows and their increased ability to penetrate. So far, that adds up to 285 grains at the tip alone. The shafting weighs 12 grains per inch and he uses a 29 inch shaft for 348 grains of carbon. He is using a luma nock and (3) 5 inch barred turkey feathers so that should add another 30 grains putting us at 663 grains so far.

Since my son and I are working on a broadhead collection, I used one of the Wensel Woodsmen to do a little testing. The woodsman has a very sharp tip but bison bones are big so I filed a secondary tip angle which shortened the head by about an 1/8 of an inch but will make the tip less likely to bend or curl upon impact with a large bone. I am planning on a worst case scenario in that he hits a rib on both sides of the bison.



Next, I took the woodsman and sharpened it to a fine edge and then lapped it on ceramic plates to get a mirror finish on the cutting edge.





In an effort to show my friend the benefits of a cut on contact head, I set up an experiment where he and I used two very common and popular heads on the market. A Muzzy and a Thunderhead that were in my collection. I used a short length of shaft and some sponges to keep the arrow from sliding around on the scale.





I used a very thick and heavy piece of boot leather as the test medium. I placed the leather over each broadhead and by holding the leather out at the edges, pressed down until the head passed thru the leather. My friend watched the scale to check the poundage. I started with the Muzzy. I pushed down until I reached 30 pounds of force and I could not get the tip to go thru the leather.



Next, I used the Thunderhead and when I applied 24 pounds of force, the head came thru but ripped the leather until the blades could start cutting. The thunder head hole is to the right on the picture above.



Lastly, we used the Woodsman and It went thru the leather so fast and with such ease that we repeated the test several times to make sure we could trust the results. After 4 tries, we kept coming up with the same results. It took 6 pounds of force to slice thru the leather and there was no tearing, just clean cuts. There are other heads on the market with cut on contact tips that are just as good but I think the Woodsman was a good choice for this hunt.

I hope to have the shafts in a few days so I can begin to construct the arrows. In order to reach the 700 plus final weight, I have decided to use a few 27 inch lengths of .065 string trimmer (weed whacker) line that will be placed inside the arrows. This will ad length from front to back but will not change the arrow spine which is 350. I will post more as the project progresses.

 

132
Whitetail Deer / Very odd deer injury (with pics)
« on: January 08, 2008, 08:49:54 PM »
This deer was harvested with a bow on Dec. 30th by Jay Trudell in South Eastern Wisconsin. Jay made a great hit and the deer piled up inside of 50 yards.



On New Years Eve, Jay brought to deer to me for processing. I skinned it for a shoulder mount, stopping right behind the ear.



The buck dressed out at 175 pounds and has a good layer of fat on it’s rump. Every indication was that this was a normal, healthy deer. I returned the head to Jay for mounting. After the taxidermist capped the skull, he cut the skull plate to remove the antlers. As he finished the cut, he hit metal. Jay got the skull and antlers back and cleaned them and brought them to be to show me what was inside the brain of this deer. The hide was completely healed and did not give away that there was an injury. The threaded portion of the head had snapped off.







The deer had been shot in a prior season with a Wasp Hammer broadhead. It entered the brain but did not kill the deer. It also passed through the hinge of the jaw and had grown over with bone and prevented the law from opening all but the smallest amount.









I placed one of my aging jaws next to the skull to show how the jaw hinge should look.



Here you can see the opposite healthy side



The bone had grown over the broadhead and through the vent in the blade and bridged the gap.



The upper left arrow shows how much hinge movement was allowed in the jaw, The opening and closing of the mouth had worn a curved area away



The shot appears to have taken from the ground and not an elevated stand and looks to be nearly perfectly broadside. I can’t understand why someone would aim there unless they were taking a neck shot. I think that would have been a poor choice as well.

133
Whitetail Deer / Notes from the 6th CWD advisory meeting
« on: December 20, 2007, 09:55:48 AM »
Notes from the Dec. 15th CWD advisory board meeting:

Prior to this meeting, panel members were asked to draft a set of CWD recommendations and forward them to the team lead for compilation in a effort to streamline the brainstorming portion and to see where the common ideas lie. Most members did this. This effort generated a 20 page document that we will use as the basis for our recommendations. The panel met with the intension of getting through a large portion of the proposed recommendations. Although many common themes were identified by panel members, the devil is in the details an we were hung up in short order.

We began by word smithing a set of general recommendations. Trying to get 18 members to agree on the wording was an exercise in frustration. When completed, we moved onto more specific recommendations such as establishing a new CWD boundary and renaming it the CWDMZ (CWD management zone) The members of the panel that lived in the current DEZ and HRZ wanted to remove the stigma associated with names of the current zones. The new boundary would be defined by locating the most extreme locations of deer that tested positive for CWD and then add a 10 mile buffer zone beyond that. The buffer zone was established using deer dispersal data gathered from an earlier meeting. This will shrink the current HRZ in most areas but push it out in others. Many wanted to do away with the boundary and return to the use of current DMUs but we voted to set a boundary because of later talks that would cover such things as carcass removal and transportation for the endemic area as well as defining a test area.

In the afternoon, we heard public comment which was a series of people thanking us for our efforts and reminding us that whatever we come up with, would need to be sold to the public and if they did not accept our plan that it is doomed to failure.


We then focused on setting deer population goals for the CWDMZ. In the earliest stage of CWD, the DNR set a goal of zero deer for the area which lead to the eradication idea. After 5 years, the agency softened that goal to 5 deer per square mile. Our panel chose to set as a goal, a deer population that matched the population goals for 2001 with a planned reduction of 20% over a 5 year period. It should be noted that all of our plans were set in a 5 year time frame for the sake of simplicity and consistency. Many members have heard from their constituents that they are tired of the constant changes from year to year and longed for a set of rules that would last for a period of time, to be evaluated for success at the end of the set term. These same people expressed concern that current goals could never be met and were not realistic. Our plan was to offer a goal of reduction but in an achievable manner.

The reason for setting the goal higher than is currently set came from a vote taken early in the meeting where members wanted to set a benchmark for disease reduction. Some panel members feel that a reduction in the deer herd equals a reduction in cases of CWD. Others suggest that there is no basis in scientific fact that supports that idea. Our scientific support team was asked about this matter and suggested that they felt fewer deer meant fewer opportunities of environmental contamination (soil) but could not say that anything above zero deer per square mile would reduce disease prevalence. Even if all the deer were removed from the area, the environmental reservoir remained and any new deer introduced to the area could become infected via that vector. I think that 5 years of social, political and scientific pressures have lead to a softening of the agencies stance on eradication.

Before the meeting ended, we discussed the fact that we still have much to cover but only one meeting left to complete our work. I mentioned that I spoke with Keith Warnke and that he expressed that we could have more time if we thought we needed it. His comment was that he thought it was more important to produce a good product, rather than to rush to meet an arbitrary time line. The group decided to start our Jan. Meeting an hour earlier (8 am) and stay on through 8 pm. We also agreed that we would extend by adding a meeting in Feb. The meeting adjourned around 4:30 pm. The next meeting is scheduled for Jan. 12th

Here is a partial list of remaining issues/topics for which we will formulate recommendations. Each of these is a category that has sub topics.

Season structure/ dates
Bag limits
Youth hunting
Year round hunting
Tags/ tagging
EAB structure
Weapons and methods
Urine based scents
Landowner issues
Access to state lands
Testing
Non hunter harvest/sharpshooting
Research
Education/outreach
Enforcement
Deer farming
Feeding/baiting
Incentives
Food pantry
Funding

As you can see, there is much to do. I do not think we will be able to thoughtfully cover it all in the remaining time and think more meetings will be needed to do it right. I remain hopeful



134
Whitetail Deer / un-official contest
« on: December 04, 2007, 07:27:03 PM »
OK folks. Time to make your best guess. What will the total deer harvest bee for 2007. We have seen the 9 day gun season preliminary numbers but I am looking for the total for all of archery season, gun season, ML season and Dec. T-zone. Ending Jan. 6th. ( I have not considered the Late Late CWD hunts that go until the end of March.) You can give a lump total or if your feeling bold, you can give estimates for the Archery, All gun and ML season separately. I am still working on my estimate. Lets make the deadline for submissions ........... Friday Dec. 7th

135
Post your Whitetail Pictures HERE / Rancid Crabtree Rosholt, WI
« on: November 27, 2007, 06:04:59 AM »
Last hunt of the last day of season. 8 point, 14 inch spread.


Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 13
Google
Web http://www.wisconsinoutdoor.com